ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

[Scientific editors in Italy: identity, certification and roles.] | JoVE Visualize

Home
Research Domains
Engineering

[Scientific editors in Italy: identity, certification and roles.]

Paola De Castro¹, Federica Napolitani¹, Elisabetta Poltronieri¹

¹Settore Attività Editoriali, Istituto Superiore di Sanità.

Recenti Progressi in Medicina|November 22, 2016

View abstract on PubMed

Summary

This study highlights the lack of professional training and certification for editors in biomedical publishing in Italy and Europe. It emphasizes the need for discussion among stakeholders to improve publication quality and recognize the editor

Area of Science:

Biomedical Publishing
Science Editing
Publication Ethics

Background:

The Italian Chapter of the European Association of Science Editors (EASE) identified a need for professional development in scientific editing.
A general lack of standardized training and accreditation programs for professional editors exists at European and international levels.
Ambiguity in the definition of an editor's role in the Italian context necessitates clarification.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide an overview of biomedical scientific publishing in Italy.
To highlight the critical need for professional training and certification for editors.
To foster a discussion on improving publication quality and editor recognition.

Main Methods:

Analysis of biomedical production in Italy.
Survey conducted among professional associations, institutions, and scientific societies.
Initial hearing with publishers to gather their perspectives.

Main Results:

The study identified a significant gap in editor training and certification programs.
Ambiguity surrounding the editor's role in Italy was confirmed.
Publishers expressed views that contribute to understanding stakeholder needs.

Conclusions:

A constructive dialogue involving all stakeholders is essential.
Improving publication quality in the biomedical field is a key outcome.
Enhancing and recognizing the editor's profession is crucial for Italy and globally.

Engineering Practice And Education

Engineering Education

[scientific Editors In Italy: Identity, Certification And Roles.]