ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

[Clinical electronic data processing: expectations of the physician] | JoVE Visualize

Home
Research Domains
Information And Computing Sciences

[Clinical electronic data processing: expectations of the physician]

¹II. Chirurgische Universitätsklinik, Wien.

Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift|November 20, 1987

View abstract on PubMed

Summary

Clinicians often expect more from computers than current data analysis capabilities provide. This study contrasts expectations with reality, highlighting successful implementations and common misjudgments in computerized data analysis for healthcare.

Area of Science:

Health Informatics
Computer Science in Medicine
Clinical Data Analysis

Background:

Clinicians' expectations regarding computerized data analysis often exceed current technological capabilities.
Understanding this gap is crucial for effective implementation of health informatics tools.

Purpose of the Study:

To contrast clinician expectations with the actual potency of computerized data analysis.
To explore different procedural paths and their implementation success rates.
To provide examples of both efficient solutions and common misjudgments.

Main Methods:

Case study analysis of specific clinical scenarios.
Comparative analysis of expected versus actual outcomes in computerized data analysis.
Qualitative review of implementation strategies.

Main Results:

Significant discrepancies exist between clinician expectations and the practical power of computerized data analysis.
Certain procedural approaches yield higher satisfaction rates than others.
Examples illustrate both highly effective data analysis solutions and frequent errors in judgment.

Conclusions:

Effective implementation requires realistic expectations of computerized data analysis.
Careful consideration of procedural pathways is essential for successful health informatics integration.
Learning from both successful applications and misjudgments can improve future clinical data analysis.

Applied Computing

Applications In Health

[clinical Electronic Data Processing: Expectations Of The Physician]